What does tension of opposites mean




















Sep 02, AM. Kristine Dianne books view quotes. May 11, PM. Nora 77 books view quotes. May 05, PM. Cwendell86 books view quotes. Feb 15, AM. Anvesh 20 books view quotes. Jun 05, AM. I7A 36 books view quotes. Mar 30, AM. Grace books view quotes.

Feb 13, AM. Lcguz books view quotes. Jan 29, AM. Cym books view quotes. Jan 11, PM. Caligo books view quotes. Dec 26, PM. Jt books view quotes. Dec 14, PM. Gusti 85 books view quotes.

Sep 26, AM. Megha 0 books view quotes. Jul 04, AM. Maryann 20 books view quotes. Mar 28, AM. Fatima books view quotes. Aug 31, AM. Harmeet books view quotes. Feb 19, AM. What's this identity business? For instance, let's say a stock in your portfolio has been underperforming for awhile and you think it would be a good idea to sell. However, you can't bring yourself to do so. Think about your identity in this context. What is the story you tell yourself? Do you believe you are someone who doesn't give up on something?

Or maybe your identity is that you aren't a great stock picker and so you don't trust yourself to sell one stock and buy another? But what if you could construct a different identity so that you can make an optimal decision? Step one is figuring out what your main goal is. Is it to make the best return possible? Is it to get a good return with minimal risk? Or something else? Step two is discerning what the best identity would be that aligns with your goal.

If the goal is to make the best return possible, an ideal identity would be: I am a money-maker. This shocks you out of the inability to sell a stock. If the best decision is to sell, then you will, if your identity supports it. Obviously this is simplistic, but the main idea remains: identity plays a bigger role than we think.

Most of the time we don't specifically realize what our identities are. Instead, they subconsciously affect our choices. If we aren't aware of them, we will resort to making emotional decisions.

After he takes his pills, Morrie asks Mitch if he shall tell him what it feels like to be dying. This conversation, then unbeknownst to Mitch, marks the beginning of their first lesson.

Mitch flashes back to his freshman year of college. He is younger than most of the students and tries to look older by wearing an old gray sweatshirt and dangling an unlit cigarette from his lips, even though he does not smoke. He builds a facade of toughness, though it is Morrie's "softness" that he finds so inviting. He enrolls for another class with Morrie, who he reports is an easy grader.

One year, Morrie gave A's to all the young men who were in jeopardy of being drafted to fight in the Vietnam War. Mitch nicknames Morrie "Coach," and Morrie tells him that he can be his player, as Mitch can play the parts that Morrie is now too old for. They eat together in the cafeteria, and Mitch notes that Morrie is a slob when he chews; during their friendship, he has harbored two great desires for Morrie: to hug him and to give him a napkin. Morrie's appearance on "Nightline" has made him somewhat of a celebrity, and many people call and ask to come visit.

This makes Mitch remember the college friends he has lost touch with. He wonders what has happened to him in the time that has lapsed between college and the present. Essentially, he has traded the dreams he had in youth for wealth and success. He believed that our lives can only flow along an ascent, that psychic energy insists on the fulfillment on it owns terms, and there can be no energy available for life unless there is the tension of the opposites. This means that we must make conscious the opposite of the ego, the opposite of our conscious standpoint, and hold both in a state of inner conflict until the SOUL fashions a resolution.

Only through bringing to consciousness the material which we have repressed can the tension of the opposites be created. These are the only conditions in which psyche has the possibility of moving forward. Life is born only of the spark of opposites CW7 para Here is another paradox. The psychological mechanisms of splitting and repression come from our hardwired survival instinct; they are part of our nature.

As children, we need to split to keep ourselves alive. It starts very young as we come to understand how powerless we are in the world and how dependent we are on our caregivers for survival. We need the capacity to distinguish between bad sensations and good sensations — bad to put your hand on a hot pot; bad to have a wet stinky diaper that burns; bad to be hit.

On the other hand, it is good to be fed; good to be dry and warm; good to be held and comforted. When the good and bad parts are split in our consciousness, the shadow is created. We identify with the good parts of ourselves that our families and society find acceptable.

We repress and reject the unacceptable parts and say that they are bad. Sometimes it is the other way around, we say we are bad and project the good parts or overly idealize the other. The key to understanding what we split off can be found in our judgments. Judgment is an instrument of separation. Judgment distinguish this from that, we from them, and good from the bad. In its extreme form, it is an instrument of rejection. Wherever there is judgment, we contract and close ourselves off from love, compassion, healing, and resolution.

The experience of the tension of the opposites or holding the inner conflict consciously is challenging. It is hard! It asks us to be courageous and brave. We want to send that pesky unconscious material packing back to where it came from.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000